SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Solon who wrote (18749)7/20/2001 10:25:13 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
Solon, I was not misleading or misdirecting. In our conversation we were talking about the rights of and the moral status of the thing that is aborted. You then respond "still act as if every unwanted smudge of sperm should be forced into existence" and "but your sperm don't thunk". I guess you could have been writing about something else, I can't read minds, but if so then 1 - Your post was misleading and not directly relevant to the point at hand, and 2 - You did not make it clear that you were talking about about something else, if you change the subject you should give some indication. That whole sub branch of our conversation was about the moral status and rights (or lack there of) of the thing that is aborted, in other words the fetus or embryo.

Is a zygote, or a
morula...equal to a fetus??


A zygote or a morula is not what is killed in an induced abortion. Also neither is the same as a smuge of sperm.

but you then added "blob" of sperm in order to make it appear that I might have been alluding to a
blastocyst stage of development.


I added "blob of sperm" because I thought that was what you said. In reality you said "smuge of sperm". I admit this was a misquote, but it doesn't change the meaning. When I used the wrong term (blob instead of smuge) it wasn't a direct quote. When I did make a direct quote it was correct. If you are so upset about the difference between a "blob" and a "smuge" then I apologize for misleading people in to thinking you said "blob".

Only a fool or a dishonest person could confuse the description of "a smudge of
sperm" with a developed fetus--only a fool or a dishonest person.


But since we were talking about developed fetuses and embryos your use of the term "smudge of sperm" was either foolish or dishonest, or atleast careless.

Especially--since I was gracious enough to fully explain the matter!

Your explanation is that you were talking about a zygote which is 1 - not subject to induced abortion so it is not what we were talking about and 2 - not a sperm or a smudge of sperm.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext