SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: thames_sider who wrote (18957)7/23/2001 8:42:46 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
In my opinion, it would be difficult to select competent experienced advisers who were not those with an agenda. The difference between the Bush advisers and say Clinton/Gore advisers I am quite confident, would be that you are more comfortable with the Clinton/Gore agenda than the Bush agenda. But to take a position that Bush advisers are somehow tainted because the agenda differs is unrealistic and unfair. Personally, i didn;t care much for Robert Reich, Donna Shalala, et al. (and any respect for their integrity I totally lost when they failed to resign during the Lewinski scandal)but I did admire their intellect and commitment their agenda. I find Bush selection of advisers to reflect the Bush agenda. The quality is very good, plenty of experience and plenty of intellect, hardly backward thinking. Liberals like to use the term "isolationist"like it is a bad thing. its not necessarily. But in this case I think it is misused because I think the Bush agenda is more to put a primiary emphasis on US interest first and that is refreshing after the past eight years. Tangibly, the Bush gambit on missile defense appears to be paying off with the joint statement of Putin and Bush tying arms reduction to missile defense. The Europeans were wrong about the deployment of Pershings and they appear to have been wrong again about missile defense.

The tax cut being risky? In light of the fact that it phases in over 11 years, I can not hold this a valid criticism. Bush enviro policy has been misrepresetned I beleive by a leftist mianstream press in the US and he has shown some flexibility on the "global warming" issue for which he is not given credit.

Your comments about a powerful state are quite out of step with the Bush agenda. I would need to see specific examples of what you refer to to comment more definitively. In fact it is my impression (and I do live in the US) that quite the opposite is true. Bush is typically conservative, lower taxes, smaller government, more local control of issues that matter locally like education.

JLA
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext