The rise and fall of a high-tech star Last year's sensation, Montreal-based NHC, had its wings burned in the telecom bust Matthew McClearn SPECIAL TO THE STAR From the current issue of Canadian Business
Greek mythology tells us of poor Sisyphus, a mortal condemned to push a huge stone up a mountain only to have it repeatedly roll down again. As punishment for his earthly transgressions, it was his fate to continue this fruitless labour for eternity in Hades.
Perhaps president and CEO Sylvain Abitbol can identify with him. Little more than a year ago, at the height of the telecommunications boom, his Montreal-based equipment maker NHC Communications Inc. boasted the grandest growth of any company on the Canadian capital markets.
One year later, NHC's stock has clearly returned to the plains - and if the company doesn't start moving some product, it could have an empty wallet by year's end.
The source of Abitbol's torment is the telecom bust - hardly surprising, since NHC's main product, ControlPoint, is aimed exclusively at solving problems for the phone companies.
When a new customer signs up for phone or Internet service, providers typically dispatch a technician to do the grunt work (the industry calls this a ``truck roll''). There, he'll find a panel called a main distribution frame (MDF), where he can patch cables to connect the customer with the new service.
If line noise or other problems develop, another truck roll may be required. And if the customer isn't happy and cancels service after two months, yet another visit may be required. That game can get expensive.
``This is one of the few areas in a telco that hasn't been automated,'' says Marvin Garellek, marketing director for NHC. (Abitbol was unavailable for comment.) ``It makes perfect sense to automate it.''
ControlPoint does just that. Instead of sending technicians, phone companies tell ControlPoint which connections to make via the Internet. A robotic arm inside the unit does the rest. That allows service providers to connect or disconnect lines and diagnose service problems without leaving the office.
``It impacts quality of service and speed of time to market, and reduces operational costs,'' Garellek explains.
At the height of telecom madness - in early 2000, when the industry more resembled a happy asylum of exuberant soothsayers - NHC anticipated that ControlPoint would be a hit among the competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), the unruly group of upstart carriers that challenged old incumbents (ILECs) after telecom markets were deregulated during the 1990s.
Particularly promising were providers of DSL (digital subscriber line), the method by which phone companies offer high-speed Internet service over old copper lines. So sure was Abitbol of ControlPoint's potential that he abandoned all other switching technologies that NHC had developed since he founded it in 1985.
Making similar assumptions, investors heaved the company's shares from penny stock to the $20 range in the first quarter of 2000. That spike earned NHC the Number 1 spot in last year's Canadian Business Investor 500 ranking, with an eye-popping one-year return of 2,088 per cent. It seemed that the company was destined for greatness worthy of Mount Olympus.
NHC planned to earn income from CLECs while negotiating more lucrative agreements with the ILECs. Not a bad idea - the old-world carriers are both bureaucratic and cautious in adopting new technologies, so it takes a lot longer to get them to fill out an order form. But suddenly, NHC's boulder got a lot heavier. By mid-2000, service providers realized that they had overbuilt their network.
For example, worldwide IT research and consultant firm IDC estimates that of the 9 million DSLAM lines (Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer, the device at a central office that accepts all the DSL lines) sold in the United States in 1999 and 2000, only 2.3 million are actually in service.
``Service providers have purchased far more equipment than is taking revenue,'' says Brad Baldwin, director of broadband technologies at IDC. ``Everyone has way overspent on capital expenditures.''
Those capital expenditures have now been curtailed. Not that service providers could have done otherwise: The capital markets also collapsed as investors fled in panic.
The resulting slaughter is worthy of Homer's Iliad. In Canada, Axxent Inc., Cannect Communications Inc. and C1 Communications Inc. are just some of the CLECs claimed by the cataclysm. Confronted by the sobering facts, industry giant Nortel Networks Corp. left the DSL equipment market entirely.
In the United States, the carnage was even worse. The toll on NHC was palpable: ``More than 60 per cent of our customer base dried up,'' says Garellek.
For example, NewSouth Communications Corp., a CLEC offering service in the southeastern United States, cancelled its orders for more ControlPoint units (it currently has 100 in service). NewSouth owed NHC $3.9 million, of which only $2.7 million is covered by insurance.
With a sudden implosion of its potential customer base, investors had a dramatic change of heart regarding NHC's prospects. Its stock recently closed at $2.55, off 87 per cent from its high of $19.90 in March, 2000. Needless to say, NHC did not make this year's Investor 500.
NHC now stands between a rock and a hard place. At the beginning of June, it had only $7 million in the bank, which the company says will see it through to year's end.
In a bold attempt to reinvent NHC, Abitbol has restructured his product line and sales pitch to focus almost entirely on the ILECs. In June, he unveiled Curbside, a remote cabinet for deploying voice and data services featuring ControlPoint. But the ILECs have clawed back their capital spending too - more bad news for NHC.
``They're stuck in this period with no sales,'' says Chris Bonnet, an analyst at Groome Capital.com Inc. in Montreal. ``It's very risky, because if the ILECs delay any further they could have another quarter without any revenues. But if the ILECs do pull the trigger, NHC could have a phenomenal quarter.''
Once a believer, Bonnet slapped a ``hold'' rating on NHC's shares earlier this year.
IDC's Baldwin is less sanguine. ``I think NHC is in serious trouble,'' he says.
Sales arrangements remain difficult to obtain. For one thing, ControlPoint is a new technology with a limited track record. For another, potential customers are clawing back their spending and trying to make do with the networks they presently have.
Finally, the very orders NHC needs may be scared away by its precarious situation - after all, who wants to buy a product that quite possibly won't be supported or further developed?
Service providers also know that there are competing products to choose from. Automated MDFs are made by privately held Simpler Networks Inc. of Montreal and Turnstone Systems Inc. of Santa Clara, Calif. Moreover, ControlPoint is based on a robotic connection component made by Oki Electric Industry Co. Ltd. of Japan.
``All NHC did was find this product that nobody was really selling, and sign an agreement to sell it (in North America),'' analyst Bonnet says. But now Oki's matrix is also sold by Avaya Inc., a large unit recently spun off by Lucent Technologies Inc. ILECs would probably rather do business with a better established, more experienced company like Avaya.
``ILECs are notorious for wanting to get maximum longevity out of a product'' says Baldwin. They insist on dealing ``with large, name-brand vendors,'' he adds. And name brand, NHC is not.
``I've never heard of NHC,'' Baldwin exaggerates to make the point. ``This isn't good in itself. That means the company lacks visibility.''
Ultimately, ILECs and established CLECs will probably show little interest in ControlPoint this year unless NHC slashes its sticker price. Right now, ControlPoint costs about $100 (U.S.) a port, meaning that its five models range from $80,000 to $450,000.
``I'm getting indications from potential customers that it may be something that they're waiting for prices to come down on,'' says Bonnet. ``If they (NHC) want to get any market share this year, they'll probably have to give the product away. It's a cat-and-mouse game, and the telecom service providers know that.''
To give itself some breathing room, NHC could always try to raise money. ``If there is a cash crunch,'' Garellek asserts, ``I don't think we'll have any problem raising sufficient capital to reach our goals.''
The company did manage to raise $10 million (Canadian) earlier this year in a deal with Yorkton Securities Inc. But a repeat performance in the absence of sales could prove difficult: The capital markets are steering clear of most telecom plays these days.
NHC's position is, to say the least, tenuous. It doesn't look like anybody's going to be rushing to buy its product - or its stock - in the near future.
But Abitbol may yet escape being crushed. For one thing, Bonnet says ControlPoint has clear advantages over competing products (NHC reports that it is performing well in tests by ILECs). For another, automated main distribution frames are a good idea.
``This kind of technology is absolutely mandatory,'' says IDC's Baldwin. ``From here on in, you have to install equipment of this nature.''
After all, DSL providers know that they must cut costs and improve quality of service. Garellek believes that NHC will weather the storm because its product can help providers do just that.
``We expect spending to materialize by the end of 2001 and through 2002,'' he says. ``I think 2002 will be a banner year.''
Will that be soon enough?
That's a nail-biter. But if NHC does get squashed by the telecom bust, Abitbol can at least take solace in one cold comfort: Unlike Sisyphus, he won't have to push the stone up the mountain a second time around.
THE TORONTO STAR |