SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (138253)7/23/2001 9:53:54 PM
From: hmaly  Read Replies (1) of 1583757
 
Tim.....Re Bush and Putin Tie Antimissile Talks to Big Arms Cuts
nytimes.com.

GENOA, Italy, July 22 —

If, as we understood from each other today, we are ready to look at the issue of offensive and defensive systems together as a set, we might not ever need to look at that option," Mr. Putin said. <<<<<<

This could be big. We could have a whole new framework for peace that doesn't rely upon the MAD concept. And Ted said GW wasn't visionary. By reducing our and Russian nukes down to 2500 or less, the world will be a far more secure place. If Russia comes over to GW's side, missle defense will easily pass; and the dems will still be defending a 30 yr. old treaty which doesn't make sense anymore. That is a leader. One who has the vision, and the determination to carry it out, and have the rest of the world follow his lead. Will missile defense cost money. Yes, but it also costs money to maintain 7500 warheads. While it won't be a wash, the world will be a safer place because of it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News