Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 176.67

+1.6%

Nov 12 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: slacker711 who wrote (13188)	7/24/2001 10:32:28 AM
From: foundation	Read Replies (1) of 196628

"It seems to me that they should have gone through with the spin..." ---------- That was my view as well. I would have insisted yesterday that the spin was a go. Perhaps there are reasons (operational, IP, association over time - after the 5 year IP transfer agreement) that made spin less attractive if not required. Regarding your earlier point, I'd infer that potential IP issues regarding 1xevdv were addressed in license agreements with NOK, etc.... Adversarial vendors have been mudding around in 3GPP2 for some time and will only increase... Can't see how this prospect would slip through the cracks...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next