Texas Insulates Itself from the National Grid. You've got to wonder why, if it's so great to tie together the eastern and western states with interconnected grids, which the Bushies are trying to force on us, that Texas has chosen to go it alone. I say let 'em secede, and the sooner the better.
All part of the master plan to allow the energy marketers to make a fortune off the other states, while insulating Texas residents from their gouging -- since their power cannot be sent out of state and cause artificial shortages at home ? These guys are hypocrites and should not be allowed to dictate to us who's going to run our grid. This battle is just beginning.
Energy deregulation is beginning to look more and more like a giveaway to a few select energy marketing companies, to make a killing at the expense of consumers. The beneficiaries appear to be the marketers/traders and a few large industrial companies who can cut volume deals. Wait until this one blows up on this bogus MisAdministration in Washington DC.
By the way, Bearcat, regarding your post awhile back, ever hear of the SEC, FAA, etc. ? Strong regulatory enforcement is needed even in deregulated industries, where potential for abuse exists amongst those who hold market power. There are fewer places where this is more necessary or important than in the electricity market, which by its very nature has few players, and who can wield market power. Do I really need to go through this for you again ?
latimes.com
Texas Insulated From Electric Upset
Power: Deregulation comes slowly to a state that has managed to isolate itself from the
rest of the nation's grid.
By MEGAN K. STACK, TIMES STAFF WRITER
HOUSTON -- One could argue that Texans
caught another lucky break this week when the
state's electricity deregulation experiment was
delayed for the third time. After all, as the West
Coast learned the hard way, privatizing power is a
dicey business.
But the risks of deregulation in one of the nation's
energy hubs are peculiarly low, thanks in part to a
protectionist system that has effectively walled off
the state's electric grid from the rest of the nation.
The power grid is the handiwork of tough
politicians and an isolationist streak in a state where popular bumper stickers
still urge secession from the union. Over the years, Texas has gone to pains to
make sure no other state linked itself to the electric network. In the meantime, it
has built a network of natural gas, oil, nuclear and coal-powered plants that can
pump out 20% more electricity than Texas can use. All are contained within
Texas' borders and therefore immune to the directives of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, which oversees electricity in the rest of the country.
"Texas is the most isolationist state in the entire union," said Philip K. Verleger
Jr., a Newport Beach-based economist specializing in energy markets. "It's
astounding how a litany of politicians from Texas have managed to impose
protectionism on energy resources."
President Bush, the former Texas governor, has introduced an energy plan
calling for a national electrical grid and even proposed the unfettered flow of
power among Canada, Mexico and the United States. Meanwhile, there are
three grids in the nation: the East, the West--and Texas.
The robust supply of power means that, for now, customers here are unlikely
to face the sharp price spikes and blackouts that plagued California
deregulation. California's dramatic price spikes were driven, in part, by a lack
of supply.
But even with the cards stacked in favor of the Lone Star State, discarding six
decades of regulation hasn't been easy.
Thousands of Texas households were poised for their first taste of an open
electricity market this week--until a pilot program had to be delayed once
again. Originally scheduled to begin June 1, the experiment has been postponed
three times while officials tinker with a new, centralized computer network that
coordinates the movement of electricity throughout the state.
When the pilot program finally creaks to a start--now set for July 31--a test
sample of Texas electric customers will buy power from competing companies.
The experiment is meant to smooth any technical kinks before Jan. 1, when the
state's investor-owned power monopolies are to be dismantled.
But if July 31 "comes along and we're still not ready, we'll go ahead and delay
it again," Jennifer Taylor said. Taylor is a spokeswoman for the Electric
Reliability Council of Texas, or ERCOT, the agency charged with running the
state's power grid.
"None of these things are easy," ERCOT chief Tom Noel said. "They're very
complex."
Customers are nonplused.
"It doesn't inspire a lot of trust when it's messy before it even gets started," said
Karen Higgins, 37, a Houston bank manager. "I won't make a move until
everything is straightened out."
That sentiment is common among residents: Despite prodding from radio and
television spots, households have greeted their newfound commercial freedom
with a collective shrug. The state hoped to test 247,000 households, but only a
third of those have signed on to the experiment.
The indifference is, in part, chalked up to inertia. Most people can't be
bothered to slog through complicated paperwork or listen while telemarketers
promise to shave a few bucks off the electric bill.
And then there's California: The specter of the West Coast's woes--the images
of darkened classrooms and household despair--haunt Texas' move into
deregulation.
"They want us to go through the same mess here?" asked Lekeya Rowe, a
24-year-old aide in a Houston nursing home. "I wouldn't trust it. It's too hot
here not to have electricity."
The state has tried to soften the worries: ERCOT's Web site features a short
essay entitled "Texas is not California!!!" and a "Top Ten List: Texas vs.
California."
"Texas," the Web site reads, "has learned from the experiences of others."
In a state where air-conditioning is a way of life and widespread manufacturing
and technology gobble up power, electric bills are serious stuff. And Texas has
remained impervious to the woes plaguing other parts of the country. Texans in
recent years have paid roughly 12% below the national average for each
kilowatt-hour they use.
Austin lawmakers voted in 1999 to deregulate the electric market, joining the
20 other states that had opened power sales up to competition. It was a heady
time: Lawmakers and then-Gov. George W. Bush predicted plummeting
electric bills.
"I believe it's going to reduce rates and increase competition," Bush told
reporters before signing the bill into law. "And I know it's going to be good for
clean air."
With a stroke of Bush's pen, electric rates were frozen. Lawmakers ordered
rates to hold steady for two years, then drop by 6% once deregulation kicks in.
But thanks to sky-high costs of natural gas, households expecting a 6% drop
on their January bills could be in for a nasty surprise. The decrease will be
adjusted for fuel costs, so household bills could still be steeper than they are
now.
Consumer groups in Texas have eyed deregulation with trepidation. They
believe households could end up paying more--while big industrial customers
use their considerable leverage to haggle for lower rates.
"I haven't seen any evidence anywhere in the country where this is good for
residents," said Carol Biedrzycki, director of the Texas Ratepayers'
Organization to Save Energy. "It appears to work best for big industry. Their
accounts are so large, they've got the power to bargain."
Texas might be well positioned to avoid California-style price spikes or
shortages in the short term, but some say its isolation from the rest of the nation
might come back to haunt it.
Some power plants here are rickety and nearing retirement. As deregulation
gets on in years, the test will be whether enough private power companies want
to build enough plants in Texas to keep the state's capacity ahead of its
growing need for electricity. They will want to sell power to the highest bidder,
wherever that bidder is.
"A lot of people are putting power plants in Texas on the theory that they're
going to make money, and I think they're going to want pretty quickly to be
hooked up to the rest of the country," Verleger said.
Noel, of ERCOT, says: "I don't know the answer; I know we're working on it
now. The state will do what it can to encourage the continued building of
plants."
That's just the sort of uncertainty that puts consumer advocates on edge.
"It's uncertain--there doesn't seem to be anything that's definite," Biedrzycki
said. "These are critical elements in the system that aren't operating yet.
"But we just more or less have to wait and see how it goes." |
