SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : LL Knickerbocker(KNIC)/Pure Energy Corp

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Juan Dominguez who wrote (480)6/18/1997 9:47:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug   of 1028
 
>>SGA Goldstar has not or ever has taken money from companies in order to
promote them. My colleagues have recieved SGA's reports for 12 years now and
have enjoyed their unbiased reports. <<

juan, for the record i would like to state that i have no interest in this stock. i don't even know what knic does or what they don't do.

you statement that sga hasn't taken money to promote a stock may be true and it might not be true. I KNOW THAT THEY DO TAKE STOCK (IN THE CASE OF SEXI STOCK - ALLEDGEDLY ILLEGAL AND UNREGISTERED STOCK!) TO PROMOTE COMPANIES. THEY DID FOR SEXI. now, you are either ignorant of this FACT or its relevance to this discussion or you have an agenda to make sga look like something it isn't be very conveniently leaving this FACT out.

ya'll wanna know what else the boys at sga did? they alledgedly sold sexi stock while telling their readers they were dumb (paraphrase) to sell and should be "loading the boat."

surely you remember this juan? did you know they were selling while hyping little sexi? alledgedly illegal and unregistered shares?

did you know that shannon terry - you know him, right? - is currently under heavy scrutiny from the sec? did you know that his attorney was busy deposing people - i assume to develop some sort of defense as recently as this week?

what does this mean about knic? i have no idea. knic may be great. but, please don't mislead the investors on this thread that the boys at sga are dressed in white or don't receive compensation from some companies for their "news." the sga research on sexi was much less than worthless (ie, non freaking existent!)or, worse yet, was very good and they knew it was a scam and were hyping it so others would buy and they could sell out.

either way doesn't boad worth a buffalo mickel for sga.

if knic is good then do yourself a favor and exclude any sga research that says it is good. if independent research doesn't reveal a good company then run like the dickens.

good luck...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext