Right Wing Extremist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Father Terrence who wrote (13025)	7/25/2001 12:53:01 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 59480

They can disagree, but they would be erroneous. An adult, American woman has full natural and constitutional rights. A fetus (potential human) has no constitutional rights, unless PETA wins and you want to extend "animal" rights to it. A fetus would not have animal rights it would have human rights as it is an undeveloped human. The constitution itself does not mention the unborn (nor does it mention the privacy right of a woman to have an abortion). A fetus is more then a potential human it is a human just one at an early stage of development. I disagree most strongly with your postulation of "rights" created by courts. Could you provide more detail about your disagreement. I normally use the term rights merely to mean natural rights. By that definition courts or legislatures or constitutions or laws do not create rights. I did I believe mention the idea of customary rights but I said I wouldn't use the term normally and I wasn't specifically talking about courts. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next