SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 94.82+2.7%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: cordob who wrote (76154)7/25/2001 9:22:24 AM
From: gnuman  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
Intel does not want DDR to succeed. Intel has no vested interest in seeing DDR
succeed. The people who want DDR to succeed are the ones who can't make RDRAM successfully (cost effectively), because they didn't want to pay for the learning curve.


Intel will have DDR chip sets for servers in early 2002, whether they enable DDR on the i845 or not.

but DDR seems to have completely dropped off their "official" memory roadmap.....
Intel is not, however, going to spend a lot of money improving the DDR standard so that it works.


See above.

Intel knows what is going to happen to DRAM prices within the year. The margins will creep back up to 0%, and RDRAM will cost a little more than SDRAM.

In terms of units, DRDRAM probably had less than 3% of the market in Q1. They had ~11% revenue share based on high Q1 ASP's. If you quadruple the number of units at 1/4 the price what's the result on revenues and margins?

This price war won't be over for a long time. I see the Taiwanese DRAM makers are committed to growing capacity in anticipation of a recovery. IMO, expanding capacity can only delay the recovery.

nikkeibp.asiabiztech.com

And I read where Elpida is committed to doubling market share by 2002 through added capacity.
siliconstrategies.com

IMO, DRDRAM will exist in an environment of low margin product for quite some time. If they compete on a price/bit basis, it will be no more profitable than other devices.

JMO's
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext