From: DougAK To: Hutch & cc: gold_tutor, Bob Johnson
First, your words are those of a person getting tired frustrated
and weary from making no progess against this gata force
as you feel gata bill's hot breath upon your sweaty neck of fear.
Second, up front i agree that everyone on this GPM thread
should now cease to spam or plug or recommend any url
that generates a tax'able income for those associated with
this thread as current posters, or past posters like gata bill.
For sure this has the effect that the owner or implementator
of such web site, being that it's revenue is obtained from the
sale of commercial advertising using an eye-ball count to
determine rates, or simple a pathway through the web site
to locate where for example a service or product is sold,
will violate Silicon Investor's term of service policy as you
have so declared should be enforced as pertains to gata
and by default throught the wishes of others willing to accept
your lead and do their own follow-through towards others that
they feel fit that model you identified. Please note that even
if the page, be it the home page or another page that has a
direct link from the home page as in its direct pathname contains
the home page that has branches off it containing a revenue
source, that this person will violate TOS as spaming or pluging
their place where they derive an tax'able income.
As for the web site of gata, which is non profit, i will not supply
that url even without the front end of http..., but will only mention
the word gata or Gold Anti-Trust Action
Oops, i just remembered that you Hutch and Rarebird
and ole49r[gold_tutor] do not fully read my posts,
sooooooooooooooo Hellooooooo still there?
We shall see, as the juicy stuff is neXt. hehehehe
ok, where was i ??? [scroll up & look i must]
Need aTime-Out
This Gold Price Monitor thread's purpose is obtain from its title,
and for you to say that the gata Gold Anti-Trust Action activity
is off-topic, especially with gata's support for the Howe lawsuit
in federal court against the Powers that Be w/ gold manipulation
just rings a bell of "sure", like a bell made from marshmellows.
But back to your and those others mentioned hackneyed ways.
Your words of "I[Hutch] have no fears, because I don't believe
GATA can prove anything useful..."
Meaning what Hutch? Gata should abandon its cause because
you and Rarebird and gold_tutor and Bob Johnson have all
expressed an opinion that gata is a combination of hot air
and nonsense and anti-gold and etc. ???
Good Golly Hutch, as i have asked you and them other 3 to obtain
the articles generated from pro-gata folks that write about how
gata is correct, and for you 4 to "tear it apart" and prove your points.
But, y'up not a once have any of you 4 done that,
especially the last article i mentioned having the whole
and near complete Ball of Wax to prove gata on-target.
Duh'ation Hutch and other 3, once again here it is.
Letter No. 288
July 23, 2001
What Is Happening to America's Gold?
by James Turk
© by The Freemarket Gold & Money Report.
and please note no url at all, none etc.
a.k.a. can not get there from here
Now the following may be on topic or not,
not sure, but 4sure its from your post being used
as a reason for you to post to me.
"I[Hutch] have {in my apt} a list of many countries
that have manipulated the Price of Gold... no big deal to me.
But I also so have information that GATA would love to have.
And until they ask for it, and pay for it. I'll keep it. I doubt any
lawyer or Billy bud himself has the wherewithal to look in the
right place to find it."
First, rule # 1 Hutch = don't contradict yourself.
As in, Hutch you say gata can not prove their case
because there has been and is now zero activity
documented or present in reality for gata to obtain
to show what they say is true. Bad grammer, sorry.
But Hutch, now you say you have evidence to prove
gata's claims. Duh'ation Hutch, is it 2B or not 2B?
Second Hutch, this is the third time you have plugged
or spammed your offer to gata to buy information from you.
Violates TOS here, yes? yes
Now now, "... I[Huch] suggest you start using Prozac,
a heavy dose of it might help."
not nice Hutch,
nope not nice of a way to communicate
Now, as in "again"
"You are only using this thread to promote a website
and a group that is looking for revenge on something
that never occurred. You are in violations of the term of use
of SI. Hutch"
Again, your conclusion "... that never occurred."
yet you have made offers on the SI to sell information
to gata to help them prove their case, which you say
is not possible as in don't exist. So what is this Hutch,
you information being valid or not???
Now more of your words need help, as follows.
"PS: Don't mention my name in your GATA posts again.
Consider this your last warning."
Need clarification here Hutch, as i have connections
to law enforcement and it is easy for me to take the
appropriate steps to generate the needed paper works
if what you will do to satisfy your actions taken against
this post which qualifies as doing a "not" to your
"PS: Don't mention my name in your GATA posts again..."
and your
"Consider this your last warning." results in something outside
pitting me On Ignore or other accepted usage outlined in the
TOS of Silicon Investor or guidelines policy.
Just another "another" and/or "again" from your post.
"Promoting GATA on the backs of others name is disrespectful!"
Not sure, but are these "names" those of you Hutch
and Rarebird and ole 49r and Bob Johnson that have
posted many times in public on this thread that they
disagree with gata and gata bill etc ??? If so, then
to you its not ok to reply and communicate etc???
enough, i was going to paste more examples
enough
dougak |
