SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.90-0.1%Dec 26 3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: fyodor_ who wrote (49478)7/31/2001 2:23:34 PM
From: Dan3Read Replies (1) of 275872
 
Re: For .13µ, I recall 80nm for AMD and 70nm for Intel.

That was a long time ago. AMD was originally not going to use 193nm for .13 and not use SOI.

They delayed their .13 implementation to incorporate both at the .13 node.

It wouldn't have made much sense to move from 248nm steppers to 193nm steppers and from plain wafers to SOI wafers and not reduce the minimum feature size - what would have been the point of all those changes?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News