SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Syncrude who wrote (10607)7/31/2001 2:32:34 PM
From: Valuepro  Read Replies (2) of 10836
 
Syncrude, perhaps you should look to the differences between having property ownership and partnership interests. CVG does not need to earn 30% of Las Cristinas. Subject to KRY claims, they already own 100% of LC 4,5,6 & 7. PDG came in among other bidders as their partner via MINCA which owns work contracts. MINCA has no ownership rights. CVG was to contribute 30% of the cost of the PARTNERSHIP, not earn 30% of the property. That is not something subject to dispute. In fact, if you recall, PDG at one point offered to ADVANCE CVG it's share of development costs when CVG said they didn't have the money. The offer was as it was because PDG had only work contracts via Minca, not any property ownership. For PDG to buy a property interest would have required approval of MEM and the National Assembly.

Why the Vannessa Web site says something else, I don't know and I don't care. If you do, call them. This could merely be a matter of interpretation of the advance offered by PDG. Just guessing, but maybe CVG earns 5% until their carried cost is paid out of earnings, at which point the 30% would be considered funded. Again, that's a partnership consideration and NOT PROPERTY INTEREST.

I still find it interesting that in the history of this matter, PDG never once described the arrangement as follows:

"Presently CVG holds a 5% interest in Minca with an option to earn up to a 30% interest. Under this structure, Vannessa's ownership of Las Cristinas presently stands at 95%."

"Ownership" is the word I question.

vannessaventures.com

If Vannessa is playing word games here, so what? I don't believe they will ever mine any gold at Las Cristinas and may even have damaged their chances of exploiting their other properties at K88.

Again, subject to KRY claims, court analysis and/or new/future agreements to the contrary, CVG owns 100% of Las Cristinas 4,5,6 and 7. MINCA's interest might be 5% or 30% of the partnership income, but that does not give Vannessa 70-95% ownership of anything but MINCA's income stream, IF THEIR RIGHTS ARE ACKNOWLEDGE BY CVG following the expiry of the contract extension two weeks ago.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext