finally read mst's long winded post
You are so delusional you can't even see how delusional you are.
1. FUE: you are trying to put a positive ONLY spin on the entire FUE, mob, astn ipo thing. I presented the facts and my opinion. You are trying to twist the facts in a positive matter and negative the item even. Ivan was the managing director. If he were doing his job, he should have known what was happening. If he didn't know, he wasn't doing his job and shouldn't have been hired at astn. FUE boilerroomed three stocks at that time. The other two are out of business. The fbi and sec investigations are not over. No one has been totally cleared yet.
2. Westergaard was sued for his astn coverage and that of a few other companies as well. He did not have disclaimers. His astn posts are the main piece of evidence in that case. That case isn't over yet. He was being investigated for the current sec lawsuit during his astn invovlement. He didn't even have a license and fred didn't bother to check. West's list of services in his website also were fraud. I'm sure you read them.
3. You want me to add positive only spin to my posts and news items? That's YOUR job. You are the hypester, the one who sprays perfume on Fred's SH** for the shareholders to smell. I posted the fact. YOu can add your own positive spin. My point here was to show that fred has been invovled with a few entities iwth mob contacts CCE, FUE, with securities violations in their past.
4. the street article talks about voting for vwap and his conflict of interest. This other information I don't see anywhere. If fred told it to you instead of it being in a news article, sec doc, I'm not to apt to believe it off the bat. Fred's projections have been WAY off on everything. I don't trust his word.
5. so you are saying that kernaghan is the lesser evil in the securities industry? Your positive spin in insane. Mark Valentine controls kernaghan. He controls calp II and the other funds. Look at all the lawsuits. Why a company such as this be invovled in corporate loan sharking? It's not very reputable. Why does he get sued so many times for deals identical to astn? Why as a director would he allow astn to go for his deal even? Read the CA article about him and his recent problems.
6. Legally a controlling entity must disclose that he controls all those funds because of the percentage ownership. He makes sure some of the funds don't own over 5% which is the limit for reporting. Take a look. Look at the other companies he deals with, all losers. IFTA, FRTI, JNOT, FONX, MBPT, NPCT .... and ASTN. What do they all have in common? Look!
7. Brennan: I think fred learned a lot from brennan during those times. Would a truly ethical man want to be seen in a TV commercial with brennan knowing full well he was committing securities fraud? Look at OJ's first attorney. He turned him down because he believed he was guilty. It was unethical in his eyes to work with him yet fred has no problem working with all of these suspect entities.
8. I was told fred has dings on his nasd record which prevented him from coming into astn himself earlier. He used dover as a vehicle and became the ceo later. He said he was planning the direction of astn since 1993. Why wouldn't he want to be the ceo instantly. Supposedly astn is his baby.
another long winded positive spin ONLY response of yours. |
