SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 117.63+3.0%Dec 19 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (74346)8/2/2001 8:02:11 AM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (1) of 116818
 
<Only when you've helped feed a frenzy of accelerating POG/POSilver>

Actually, I tend to agree (opinion) with you that higher prices, especially if significant, could very well feed demand. Frenzy? Why not, PM's certainly have the allure to be grist for cocktail party conversations (but only after a big run). It's the nature of modern trend following markets.

My iceberg theory (IMO, a fact <g>)relates to the supply side (not demand) of the gold market. In my work (and I really feel I've studied the facts: you'd have to go back and read my old posts at my normal haunt:http://www.siliconinvestor.com/subject.aspx?subjectid=33190) the water needs to start warming up considerably or the production side of the equation steadily melts. The hedging heroin fix is also wearing off, and the drugs now on the street (forward prices: 2003 is 280, '04 is 290, '05 is $301) aren't strong enough.
futuresource.com

As far as LC and ABX? Well, that's just a gut (opinion) and nothing more. It strikes me as a NDY (or AU) project. And actually I'm out on a limb concerning LC as a viable project, as most don't see it as so. IMO, a lot to overcome at these prices. One is a billion dollar plus capex to handle enough tonnage.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext