SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.18-0.5%Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kapkan4u who wrote (49727)8/3/2001 1:09:25 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Intel's own statments about SOI prove that it is advantageous to AMD.
Didn't Intel say it was not "worth it" because it "only" gave a 1/2 generation improvement in performance, i.e., clock speed?

To me, a 1/2 generation of performance increase is WELL WORTH IT!

For Intel, the 0.25 generation P3 went from 600 MHz to 1 GHz on 0.18u. "Half a generation," by that indication, is about 30%.

As I said previously, even a 20% increase in clock speed would raise ASP's 60%.

Also, AMD will be getting a "half generation" worth of improvement in less than a half-generation period of time. It took 2 years to move from 0.25 to 0.18, or from 0.18 to 0.13. Getting "half a generation" worth of improved performance for 1/4 the time period is a bargain.

Perhaps it would be only marginally advantageous to go to SOI if SOI could not be applied to the next generation as well (0.10). But I believe AMD and IBM have solved the small-geometry problem.

Petz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext