SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 46.95-2.8%Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: StockMan who wrote (24919)6/18/1997 10:28:00 PM
From: Ali Chen   of 186894
 
Stockman, you may not believe my bubbling, but here is the fact:

geocities.com

This guy looks as really excited about P-II. However,
from the first table, "Windows 95 Performance of the
Pentium II", (Winstone 97 benchmark), you may find:

Business WS97 Hi-End WS97
--------------------------------------------
P2-266 64.4 32.4 (66x4)
P2-262.5 63.2 32.0 (75x3.5)
--------------------------------------------
-1.3% -1.8% -1.2%

As you see, the scores are EXACTLY the same, while the
system bus frequency was 16.6% UP! You also may check
another two lines from the table, for 66x4.5=300Mhz, and
83.3x3.5=290,5 and find out that even with 25% faster bus
the scores are the SAME again!

Now "experts" may bubble about the beauty of multiprocessing,
substitute other subjects, quanitify other advantages as long
as they wish, but you CANNOT REFUTE the FACT that the P-II
gains NOTHING from faster bus on real-world applications.

- Ali
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext