SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : EMC How high can it go?
EMC 29.050.0%Sep 15 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: stockman_scott who wrote (12950)8/8/2001 1:23:57 PM
From: Gus  Read Replies (1) of 17183
 
RE: Sun and Hitachi

The well known statistic is that less than 20% of the total cost of storage is the actual cost of storage hardware because storage management accounts for more than 80% of the total cost. Software and services are the ways to address the larger part of that total cost equation.

Stripped of pomp and circumstance, this is a primarily a hardware deal because Sun and Hitachi each had less than 1.7% of the 2000 Storage Management software market so combining the best of two of the worst storage software programs ain't gonna create a contender.

Moreover, this alliance represents the 3rd or 4th major change in Sun's storage-is-a-feature strategy since 1995 when EMC started the year with 0% of the open systems market. I'm skeptical that Hitachi hardware can make Sun more competitive.

Remember that Sun has long resisted EMC's vision of intelligent storage because array-based and switch-based intelligence undercut its efforts to sell more high-end Unix MIPS and the software and services that go along with the hardware sale. Not coincidentally, Hitachi's arrays started to sell better soon after it decided to get out of the mainframe business completely.

What this deal does is line up the ducks for EMC in an orderly fashion. When it decides to leapfrog Hitachi's flavor-of-the-year box -- when NOT if -- EMC will have a chance at hitting 3 noisy ducks (Sun-HDS-HWP) and 2 relatively quiet ones (IBM-Compaq) with each new product introduction. Note that HWP started reselling Hitachi's box for about a year before HWP terminated its reseller agreement with EMC in May 1999. Yet it still took HWP another year or so to get its bearings despite the highest priority and urgency attached to that transition by HWP's former management.

Time ain't on their side.


STORAGE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
Gartner Dataquest 1999-2000

2000 rank 1999 Share 2000 Share

1. EMC $ 803M 19.6% $1,341M 25.5%
2. Veritas 505M 12.3% 855M 16.3%
3. IBM/Tivoli 724M 17.7% 844M 16.1%
4. CA 799M 19.5% 613M 11.7%
5. BMC Software 229M 5.6% 224M 4.3%
6. NTAP 53M 1.3% 156M 3.0%
7. StorageTek 113M 2.8% 144M 2.7%
8. Compaq 45M 1.1% 143M 2.7%
9. Legato 172M 4.2% 142M 2.7%
10. HWP 68M 1.7% 87M 1.7%
11. Others 578M 14.1% 703M 13.4%

dmreview.com


THE CHANGING BATTLEFIELD
Gartner Dataquest 2000 vs 2005

2000 % 2005 %

Storage Infrastructure $ 2.0B 37% $ 7.2B 43%
Data Management 2.3B 44% 5.7B 34%
E-Storage Resource Mgt. 1.0B 19% 3.8B 23%

Total $ 5.3B 100% $16.7B 100%

is.pennnet.com

EMC has gained market share in storage software every
year since it introduced SRDF in 1995. Assuming
different market share rates, EMC Software will grow
as follows:

2000 market share - 25.5%- $1.3B

20% market share by 2005 - $3.3B
25% market share by 2005 - $4.2B
30% market share by 2005 - $5.0B
35% market share by 2005 - $5.8B
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext