Come on, Paul, as an investment banker please tell me what percentage of penny stocks achieve the success you would have for EDIS, after demonstrating the dismal performance this stock has demonstrated for so many years. I'm not looking for a "Flying Tigers" example, but a percentage please.
Is it sound investment advise to hold the large number of shares you indicate having for this ailing stock in one's portfolio for so many years, as you would suggest in this thread since 1997?
And what does EDIS holds unique, that would make it the success you imagine? I really can't see anything other than failed attempts at weed control, loss of mineral rights in foreign lands, and tall tales that never reveal the monumental results the news would lead us to believe.
Then there are brushes with those school kid investors, then the Lazarus thing, and a guy named Paul who supposedly owns tons of this stock who tells this thread how wonderful the company is, ad nauseum, when if you really did own that many shares and the company's stock was tanked for most of its life, you would either be rid of it or would be hopping mad.
Instead, you just lather up with how wonderful EDIS is and belittle as ignorant anyone who would disagree. Sorry, but you sure don't sound much different than the paid promoters who pumped Bre-X. Also, you are here checking frequently to quickly quell any uprising. Certainly it isn't good investment knowledge that motivates you here, Paul. And if you aren't being paid, then what motivates you to watch over this thread and fawn over EDIS as you do?
Thanks,
Tom |
