Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 213.43

+6.2%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Road Walker who wrote (50651)	8/10/2001 1:37:12 PM
From: Charles Gryba	Read Replies (1) of 275872

I have an idea that can be suggested to AMD if possible. There are measurements of true throughput of CPUS today and they are used on minis/mainframes etc.. It's called the MIPS, MFLOPS rating which measures actual instruction throughput not some circuit oscillation frequency which is meaningless. I think the Athlon should be rated as PR and/or MIPS/MFLOPS. Mhz/Ghz is irrelevant really, just look at the Via Chips and the Itanic. This number could even be normalized against the MIPS/MFLOPS rating of a P4 at 2Ghz and presented as a Ghz number as well. I'd like to see what the common people would do if they were presented with another measure of cpu speed instead of Mhz/Ghz. So Joe Smoe walks into Compusa and there are two machines infront of him. One says 2Ghz the other 1599Mips. What would he do? Probably ask the salesperson these questions. Which one is faster? How many Ghz does the 1599 Mips machine do? How many Mips does the 2Ghz have? In two out of three questions the Athlon Wins. Sincerely Constantine

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next