SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (21511)8/11/2001 3:53:39 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
Parties to it would have rights
and responsibilities along the lines of the parties to a marriage.


That needs some thinking about.

Would all members of a family get health insurance coverage, for instance? If you had a three-person "home team" and one wanted to exit the relationship, would that break up the home team completely, or would it be like a baseball team where you just slip the person out, and the team goes on as its legal unit? Can you add more people at will, or is it something you form once and that's it? I would assume, if you're going to have a flexible structure, that you would keep it fully flexible, so people could contract in and out virtually at will. Which makes ownership of property a real challenge. Would it be like a marriage, where when it breaks up all the property gets divided into his and hers? Or more like corporate stock where you can buy and sell shares of it, but the unit goes on uninterrupted?

And it would have major societal impacts on lots of things we might not think about. The size of houses. The size of cars. Things like that.

It's an interesting theory, but don't hold your breath waiting for some government to implement it!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext