Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin

RMBS 95.14

+0.9%

2:07 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Don Green who wrote (77236)	8/11/2001 7:37:54 PM
From: NightOwl	Read Replies (1) of 93625

"The clear and convincing evidence shows that Rambus knew, or should have known, that its patent-infringement suit was baseless, unjustified and frivolous — one which reasonably intelligent people should have known would have no chance of success," wrote Payne is a ruling released Thursday (Aug. 9). This is certainly an unusual conclusion for a case in which none of the Counterclaims asserted an abuse of process count, and I don't recall one here. The Judge certainly sounds very sure of the record before him and I would certainly agree that Tate seems hell bent on proving the statement true every time he opens his mouth. ...But I have to assume that Payne's opinion must point to some acts of bad faith beyond those we already know about, courtesy of CB. One of yesterday's articles referenced some destruction of records, but whatever it is I'll wager that it will read better than CB's "ABA" note. <Hoo> 0\|0

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next