SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Options 201: Beyond Obi-Wan-Kenobe

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan Duchardt who wrote (25)8/11/2001 11:20:13 PM
From: alanrs  Read Replies (1) of 1064
 
Okay, I think I see it. One of the reasons I'm trying to get more RAM is that I'm not able to use all the features of the Hoadley site.
Since I had only done ratio backspreads where the pink payoff line eventually just equals the main graph, I didn't run the elapsed time feature. I didn't realize the diagonal aspect would affect the whole position like it does.
One more dumb question. The reason I picked on the Jan 04 10 instead of the 5 is that the implied volatility is around 83% for it whereas the 5 is around 100%. Also, since it is a little cheaper my total outlay would be less.
Valid ways of looking at this?
Further, the Sept 15 and 20 are carrying volatility values of 108% while March is around 100%. The trade off then seems to be the total outlay, with the Sept's requiring $630 per unit (1 long and 2 short), vs about $170 per for the March. I am leaning to the March, only because I have a bias toward limiting my risk, especially in new situations, and have previously been more comfortable with more time. I don't have enough experience to know how big a factor an 8% difference in implied volatility is, so could very easily be overlooking something.

Is this making sense or is it way past my bed time?

ARS
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext