Disregarding the underlying argument for a second, I'd like to make one point clear, for you Mq and for anybody else: I'd like to read and write about facts, including also of course opinions. Never am I trying to prove anybody right or wrong - it's not me, but the facts, that should do the job.
Underlying this of course is the assumption, there's something like an objective reality and that there's ways and means and methods to prove and refute something about it.
If this not the case, well then, as Germans say, "es ist alles fur die Katz". Btw, we could then start doubting about existence of WS as well - "Is it really happening or is it just CNBC?" (g).
So back to global warming: I quoted facts to correct some impressions, which according to the quoted source were plain wrong. What you think about it, what we believe or not believe and what we intend to do, is immaterial at this specific point.
Now, to return me the favour, tell us something about Global Xing for a change (g). dj |