SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: PMG who wrote (7002)8/12/2001 6:19:31 PM
From: KyrosL  Read Replies (2) of 74559
 
I disagree with Maurice about antitrust, but I must confess that his CO2 position does not sound wacky to me.

It was only 20 thousand years ago that a good portion of the earth's temperate zone was covered with ice, and it appears that the earth almost tipped into an ice age only a few centuries ago. Computer models (the ones that model ice ages) show that ice ages can start and be established surprisingly fast -- perhaps less than a century -- and tend to persist for thousands of years. An ice age will be a catastrophe for humans, probably destroying civilization for many generations. On the other hand, a warming of the atmosphere by, say, an extra degree, which will result if we don't adopt immediately draconian CO2 reduction measures, will have a much milder effect, and may even result in an increase of food production capacity -- in addition to reducing the probability of an Ice Age. A lot of people may suffer a temporary reduction in their living standards but there will be no starvation, civilization will not be threatened and we will probably adapt and resume prospering in less than a generation.

Kyros
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext