SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : American Power Conversion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Woody_Nickels who wrote (1483)6/19/1997 12:48:00 PM
From: Bob G   of 2574
 
To: Ken, Peter

<<Fundamental analysis is NO BETTER at predicting the future than TA, but the past does repeat it-self and those who learn from the past will profit. I did!>>

I'd have to agree with Bill Tippett and Douglas Hurd.

I've recently read a book entitled A Random Walk Down Wall Street wherein the predictive value of the past as to future price movements is pretty well dismissed.

Additionally, learning from mistakes of the past, such as abandoning Fundamental Analysis, is documented quite nicely through out historical markets. This practice of market sentiment over FA is referred to as "Building Castles in the Sky".

Don't get me wrong I like a good graph too! Sort of gives me a nice summary picture against which I can analyze the fundamentals. I guess what I'm saying is a company with good fundamentals usually grows within a relative P/E range due to the fundamentals NOT because of the "Castles in the Sky". Therefor FA is better at predicting the future. IMHO

Bob G
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext