SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: hmaly who wrote (138791)8/15/2001 1:29:40 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1571399
 
It figures. When you dems can't explain your lying you fall back on the Clinton, "the definition of is is." defense. Do you really figure it will work better for you than it did for slick Willy. Frankly, if 90% of the people can't recognize something as beautiful, it isn't that beautiful. I would be willing to bet that 90% of the men who compared Roseanne and Vanessa Williams would have no problem. Why is it that no one but you can see this mystical beauty? Is it there or is it a lie. Prove me wrong.

Check out this month's issue of Nat. Geo. The ANWR's beauty is more like a Mira Sorvino rather than a V. Williams. <g>

And where do you get that number of 90%...who told you?

After seeing the pics in the NG, I think its an incredibly beautiful place. But that's not why it should be saved...beauty or a lack there of should not be the primary criterion. The ANWR needs to be saved because of the animal species located there and because the ecology is fragile. And oil tends to kill when spilled.

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News