Re <<Glad you can admit that you were bashing >>
I was just using Elmer's words, if you did not notice I put 'bashing' in quotation.
Re <<Of course, anyone pointing out your technical mistakes deserves to be bashed, isn't that right? >>
None sense. You show up in SI, make comments that are incorrect and don't expect to be challenged.
Re <<after several people told you otherwise, and the specs were staring you right in the face, that you were still too proud to admit you were wrong>>
Nope. Those people were just taking an opportunity to take a shot at me and they did. I expect the same here again, which will not bother me. If you followed the posting it became clear from the subsequent posts that you were wrong.
Re <<BTW, I still have those specs handy if you want to press the issue.>>
Go ahead, knock yourself out. You have been misinterpreting those thermal specs.
You can keep saying what you have been saying, I can respond with what I have been saying, I don't think anything will be resolved. As our discussion in PM, I thought we were going to drop this one, but apparently you changed your mind and started again by responding to my post to Elmer, which I was defending myself. Too bad I took you off Ignore.
You can go ahead and have the last word, and lets call it done.
Mani |
