SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who started this subject8/16/2001 8:43:55 AM
From: dantecristo  Read Replies (2) of 12465
 
Broadvision, Inc. [BSVN] lawsuit:

"Re: BVSN's SLAPP
by: doe9doe9 08/15/01 07:30 pm
Msg: 166424 of 166444
 
> For whatever it is worth, I called the San Mateo
> clerk for the Superior Court to confirm who the
> parties were to case no. 417698. She said that the parties
> were (as advertised) BVSN vs Does 1-9. There has
> been a motion to strike filed under the SLAPP
> statute and on Sept 7 there will be hearing to
> consider motions to seal records and to change venue. I
> wonder who filed the motion to seal records...should
> have asked.
I filed the special motion to strike under the California anti-SLAPP
statute as well as the motion to transfer venue and
the motion to file my signature and name under seal
(i.e., to proceed anonymously, as John Doe 9).
"Those who would give up essential Liberty,
to purchase a little temporary Safety,
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Ben Franklin "

messages.yahoo.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News