There was a huge history of shelling northern Israel.
Of course there was, and I haven't denied it. There is an even bigger history of Israel shelling and then invading Lebanon.
Syrian aggression (they still have 40,000 troops in Lebanon), on the other hand, is not an outrage, at least not one they will mention.
Once again, your extreme Jewish bias shows. There are no Syrian apologists on this thread, or anywhere for that matter, denying and then explaining away the actions of Syria. If Syrian propaganda were a problem, you can bet the intelligent dissidents would be screaming about it.
But how many shells would this country take quietly if, say, Puerto Rican Nationalist terrorists were shelling Laredo from Mexico?
To complete this analogy, you would need to have the U.S. attacking Puerto Rico on a regular basis, which is not happening. Of course, nobody on this thread is going to call you on this fraudulent analogy.
Tom |
