Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 36.20

+0.1%

Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (141983)	8/19/2001 9:30:34 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	Read Replies (2) of 186894

TWY, I can conclude from your eagerness to become derogatory that you have no basis for your argument, and you are simply getting nervous and frustrated that I can come up with plausible explanations for your inquiries. Besides, you are mistaken about the presentations. I have read them before, showing you to be a poor judge of my character. Since you REFUSE to acknowledge it..... the SEMs in the two Intel presentations show that the .18um process employs the notch gate process while the .13um process clearly does not. So, if you read them, why was this not obvious to you and why did this not lead you to question your own conclusion that "Wrong again, Dan. this notched poly technique is still used in all of Intel's processes"??? I ask again. What conclusions do you make from these two SEMs?? You did see them... didn't you? THE WATSONYOUTH

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next