SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Cambridge Antibody Technology Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jongmans who started this subject8/20/2001 9:53:27 AM
From: tuck  Read Replies (1) of 625
 
>>MARTINSRIED and MUNICH, Germany, Aug. 20 /PRNewswire/ -- MorphoSys AG (Neuer Markt: MOR), the German biotechnology company, announced today that the District Court in Washington, DC issued a preliminary ruling in its favour in the dispute with Cambridge Antibody Technology (CAT) concerning the Griffiths patent (U.S. Patent 5,885,793). The ruling followed a March 2001 trial at which the jury was unable to reach a verdict on the validity of the patent or whether MorphoSys infringed it. The preliminary ruling issued on August 17 states that ``MorphoSys should prevail on the issue of infringement'', pending further briefings or proceedings.

``This is very good news for MorphoSys'', stated Dr. Thomas von Rueden, Chief Scientific Officer, MorphoSys AG. ``This preliminary decision is in line with the MorphoSys view that our proprietary HuCAL® technology is independent and distinct from CAT's''.

In announcing the ruling, the Court focused on the question of whether the MorphoSys HuCAL® antibody libraries are ``derived from humans''. The Court stated that ``no reasonable jury could find that the HuCAL® library, whose starting point is theoretical analysis of data, is ''derived from a human``. A final decision by the court on non-infringement awaits further briefing from the two parties involved. Such a decision would be independent of any ultimate ruling regarding the patent's validity.<<

snip

Will we shortly see a CATG version also claiming victory? Seems to be the fashion these days.

Cheers, Tuck
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext