Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (23356)	8/20/2001 2:34:07 PM
From: E	Read Replies (4) of 82486

It was a characterization presented as a quote. It was, further, an unfair characterization presented as a quote. Because X has never, ever 'mentioned' a distaste for justice. Or for principle. Or for human values. Ever. Of course you believe my presentation of a characterization as a quote where jla is concerned is unfair. But you have little ground on which to complain, supporting as you have the presentation of hostile commentary as a quote by the hated subject of one's commentary. I could write a defense of my false attribution just as you did of bree's. What is the point? Why defend false attributions? Remember: X has never, ever 'mentioned' a distaste for justice. Or for principle. Or for human values. You will write an essay now on how conclusion could, in your and brees's opinion, be drawn that would indicate that.... etc. But... X has never, ever 'mentioned' (or expressed, Neocon) a distaste for justice. Or for principle. Or for human values. You have to define things in special ways to even come up with the commentary, much less the quote. Brees made that attribution up. You defended his doing it.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next