SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.15-0.6%Dec 24 12:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Charles Gryba who wrote (142041)8/20/2001 5:33:07 PM
From: fingolfen  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
I don't want to argue hypothetical situations. ( Like who's getting steppers first when there's a shortage ). Also, if Intel can do .13 without 193nm Steppers why can't AMD do the same? ( Is this a stupid question ? )

I'm not semi, but I can answer this one.

The smallest features being printed on any semiconductor at this point are polysilicon gates (although contact is starting to get nasty as well largely because of the tight pitch, or the number of contact holes in a given area). The width for the Intel process is 70-80nm according to published sources. This means that the final gate width is 25%-33% of the "width" of the wavelength of the light initially used to pattern it (248nm). There are a variety of ways to do this (phase shift masks are but one option).

AMD can use all of the same tricks, the only problem is that 70nm or thereabouts is where some of the tricks stop working. AMD is already running very narrow gate widths at this point, and to reduce them further (say to the 50-60nm regime) is going to require either 193nm, or pushing the existing tricks to their very breaking point (read yield fallout levels). The steppers for 193nm are not generally available, which leaves pushing the envelope on existing 248nm lithography to or past the breaking point.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext