SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.10-0.6%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Yousef who wrote (51716)8/20/2001 7:09:27 PM
From: fyodor_Read Replies (2) of 275872
 
Yousef: I have drawn the conclusion that Intel rates their chip to operate at a different die/junction temperature (~80C for INTC versus 95C for AMD) ... Is this correct, Mani?? If true, this would indicate a different level of required chip reliability between the two companies.

Actually, it looks more like it's the other way around: Intel has dropped its Tj(max) to keep the same level of chip reliability.

Check out the Slot PIII docs. They list the Tj(max) for PIIIs from 450MHz to the infamous 1113MHz. Since I don't have a link and don't know if Intel still provides the data sheet (but I assume they do), I'll provide the relevant list:
freq.   Tj(max)
450 90
500 90
533B 90
533EB 82
550 80
550E 82
600 85
600B 85
600E 82
600EB 82
650 82
667 82
700 80
733 80
750 80
800 80
800EB 80
850 80
866 80
933 75
1000 60
1000 70
1000B 70
1133 62
Judging from this, it looks like Intel had to tighten the temperature requirements every time they needed more speed. Pushing the envelope further than the process could handle, given the "old" temperature requirements, so things were tightened a bit. In the 1133MHz chips case, obviously not enough.

-fyo
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext