Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Shread who wrote (16062)	8/21/2001 8:13:57 AM
From: donald sew	Read Replies (6) of 52237

Paul, Was just watching SQUAK BOX on CNBC and they tore into the MANIPULATING ABBEY J. COHEN. CRAMER is the host analyst today and he made his attack on her, but more importantly MARK HAINES made it clear that ABBEY has been consistently wrong, where she has underestimated the runup and has severely underestimated the downside. Abbey reduced her 2001 target on the S&P from 1550 to 1500, and MARK HAINES mentioned that if she had done that years ago the morning futures would have tanked, but today there was minimum movement. It looks like the message is getting out. Mark Haines also mentioned that she has never accepted the invitation to be interviewed on SQUAK BOX where she would scrutinize for all her wrong calls. OF COURSE, she is no DUMMY - she needs to keep her MANIPULATIVE INFLUENCES on the market, however it is obvious that she is losing her influence. By the way I have only seen ABBEY appear on LOU RYKHEISER's(spelling?) show, but he is overly bullish and not objective. CNBC should be congradulated. As I have mentioned often in the past, lets ALWAYs REMEMBER those MANIPULATIVE ANALYSTS who have helped so many lose SO MUCH MONEY.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next