Interesting, confirming as they do that you are unable to find a single post of X's in which she describes herself as brees untruthfully claimed she did in his post that you and yours have attempted to pretend told the... (presumably morally unrelative) TRUTH!
Ah, absolute truth, your favorite!
Reminder, since it seems to have slipped your mind: what brees claimed is that X had 'repeatedly mentioned' a 'distaste' she, X, has for such qualities or abstract, noble nouns as the following: 'Truth.' 'Justice.' 'Human values.' 'Principles.'
You, Neocon, have repeatedly mentioned* your approval of the argumentation-technique of demonizing an enemy by 'extrapolating,' and drawing bizarre 'conclusions,' and then publicly characterizing the enemy by actually attributing the conclusions you have drawn about her to her, offering the invented 'mentions' as self-characterizations!
I repeat: The great efforts you undertook produced not a single 'mention' by X of the 'distaste' for All Things Good and Fine she is claimed to have posted!-- but only links to posts that might have been thought by an unintelligent person to justify drawing personal, tendentious 'conclusions' that could then be usefully placed in the mouth of their enemy-victim and offered to unsuspecting readers as her self-description.
*for the irony- and humor-challenged: insert <g> there.
EDIT: I see an interesting and amusing post of X's on the LWP. I'll paste it next. I hope she won't mind. I shall ask forgiveness instead of permission! |
