SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Options for Newbies -(Help Me Obi-Wan-Kenobe)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: joseph krinsky who wrote (2145)8/22/2001 8:37:03 PM
From: Dan Duchardt  Read Replies (2) of 2241
 
joseph,

It's just a continuation of a post made about it all.

Ah... so it is. I failed to pick up on the connection with the earlier posts, but reading back through them clarifies the argument. If the trader has a pre-existing agreement with a dealer for large size execution and then I suppose they can make the case, though I still think FRAUD is an entirely inappropriate description of what the guy did.. The latest link makes no mention of such an arrangement. I still think there is a big difference between the options market where there is an obligation to meet larger size and Nasdaq, where the dealers may voluntarily agree to fill larger size in order to attract clients. I don't think you will find many dealers these days who fit the description one of the many brokers that guarantee execution of customer orders of 1000 to 3000 shares at the NBBO regardless of the size of the NBBO quote The earlier links make no mention of the ridiculous spread on a low price stock mentioned in the latest post. How anyone can argue that he got 76 cents "more than he should have" on the transaction boggles my mind. There "should" never have been a spread nearly that wide to begin with.

Dan
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext