Oh, well that explains your recent posts! You didn't realize something.
I hate to be the one to break the news to you, but...
(are you sitting down?)
Brees said that X 'mentioned' (REPEATEDLY!) that she had a 'distaste' for certain things. Like human values, for example! and truth! and principles!
And you know what?
Are you sitting down?
That was HIM talking about X, HIS view of her, not X talking about HERSELF, as he inaccurate reported!!!
I pasted a couple of posts in which X spoke for herself, though, you'll be glad to know.
And get this, JLA: there are some here who think that false (shall we say 'inaccurate' instead?) attribution of a demonizing purported self-characterization is A PERFECTLY RESPECTABLE ARGUMENTATION TECHNIQUE!
Of course no one but a total moral relativist could possibly claim such a thing, or someone whose definition of truth was really elastic!
They are probably atheists. After all, no one who believed in a God of truth and love would do that, I know, because theism makes one decent and good. |
