SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (24237)8/23/2001 9:39:58 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (2) of 82486
 
do we take values as purely personal and arbitrary, or do we think there is a standard by which personal values can be judged and discussed, amended and improved?

Another question, very relevant: if we accept that a standard exists, do we assume that the standard in question is absolute, or do we believe that the standard is also amenable to judgement, discussion, amendment, and improvement? This to me is a much more significant question, since I have yet to hear anyone argue that values are purely personal and arbitrary. The debate that I have seen most frequently here is between those who believe that values are created by humans out of human experience, and that they develop and change as societies develop and change, and those who believe that values are determined by some hypothetical outside factor. I haven't seen the notion the notion that values are or should be purely personal and arbitrary enter the picture.

The notion that values must be either absolute and externally referenced or completely personal and arbitrary is not supportable; there is a world of space between those extremes.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext