SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Lloyd who wrote (91809)8/24/2001 2:08:14 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
Don,

I'm saying there is a social, as well as a purely economic component to the labor market. The labor market regularly behaves in ways that cannot be simply explained by supply and demand. Why do salaries easily rise in response to labor shortage in some professions, but nursing or teacher shortages must reach crisis proportions before any action is taken? Could it have something to do with the traditional resistance to paying real money to women?

As you discussed in a previous post, when we discuss the minimum wage we are not discussing a simple transition from no impact on the market to major job destruction. There is

a range which will have no effect on employment,
a range which will have minimal effect on unemployment,
a range which will affect business models and create labor blackmarkets,
a range which will greatly increase unemployment, and
a range which will destroy businesses

The question is, how do you determine the boundaries of the ranges? And if you believe that it would benefit the country as a whole and the economy to raise the wages of the bottom 30% of the labor force, would it be a sensible public policy to set a minimum wage that had some effect on the labor market?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext