Booms, Busts, and Recoveries Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (7715)	8/26/2001 12:56:49 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (6) of 74559

Mq, I don't want to get into an interminable pissing match about satellites on this thread. I realize that you are capable of beating this horse until it is not only dead but bloodless. Nevertheless, I find it hard to believe you don't know why GEO satellites are capable of carrying a larger payload than LEO satellites. Gravitational pull is affected by mass and distance. The bigger the mass, the greater the gravitational pull. The further the distance between the masses, the less the gravitational pull. For an object of the same mass, the further the distance, the less the pull. The closer the distance, the greater the pull. LEO satellites orbit closer to the earth, so to keep from being pulled out of orbit, they are made smaller. The devices which you describe to pull the satellite back into orbit obviously work better on smaller satellites, because they use a great deal of energy. It's not like waving a magic wand. No, I am not a rocket scientist, and neither are you. Everything I know about satellites I learned from real rocket scientists. Sorry I struck a nerve, but pissing on me isn't going to make your money come back.;^)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next