COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

COMS 0.00400

+185.7%

Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scrapps who wrote (21405)	8/26/2001 4:35:12 AM
From: analog5	Read Replies (1) of 22053

I think the dual processor PCs run the same software including Windows OS. I think tasks (pieces of the program) from a task queue are simply handed off to either processor as they become available for work. The OS probably resides in the master processor and delegates problems to the slave processor. I'm not sure, just guessing. I think the principal disadvantage is the extra power they consume, plus the added complexity and cost. They are generally put in server applications where a lot of data is being hurled around: gigabit ethernet pipes. Tyan makes the only dual processor motherboard for the AMD Palomino and it requires a special power supply. I recommend the Abit KG7 motherboard with an AMD Athlon (1.2GHz processor, 266MHz front side bus) as a single processor system that will meet all but the most critical user's needs. I find these new PCs make short order of an unimaginable amount of bloatware. The Nvidia GeForce 2 GTS (Visiontek) is a good graphics card for a single monitor. For dual display, Nvidia isn't as good as the other manufacturers. Check the reviews. If you want, I'll send you an e-mail of what I put in the next PC that I build. Steer clear of the Pentium IV - too much fast cache memory was removed to save on silicon area. It underperforms the Pentium III on many applications, especially older ones that haven't been rewritten for it. The solution: Intel brought out the little blue men on TV to convince us otherwise. I've had good luck with Win2K not crashing very often. Seems to stay up even though the application dies (like any real operating system should.) Win98 was tolerable. WinMe was truly unstable - breath on it and it crashes. I erased it from the disk. AFAIK, 3Com bailed out of anything that looked like consumer electronics. Margins were too low.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next