SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.87-0.1%2:53 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan3 who wrote (52694)8/27/2001 10:36:37 PM
From: TenchusatsuRead Replies (3) of 275872
 
Dan, <The rule of thumb is that if you don't quadruple cache, don't bother. Taking P4 from 256K to 1 megabyte of cache would be expected to increase performance by 5%. Taking it to 512K would make a 2GHZ perform like a 2.05GHZ>

Are you so sure about this, Dan? First, I've never heard of the rule-of-thumb that you just stated. The only rule-of-thumb that comes even close is the one which governs the relative sizes of two-level caches (4:1 ratio).

Second, where do you get the notion that a P4 going from 256K to 1M would only increase performance by 5%? After all, a 2.0 GHz P4 is running at a 20:1 processor-to-bus clock ratio. Decreasing the L2 miss rate by even a small amount will have a marked improvement in performance.

And third, you'll be unpleasantly surprised at the per-clock performance improvement Northwood has over Willamette. But hey, no one really needs that sort of performance until AMD can sell it for under $100, right?

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext