SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 213.50+6.2%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: AK2004 who wrote (53089)8/29/2001 9:26:17 PM
From: jcholewaRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
> from what I recall the size of ClawHammer is
> 105 mm2 and that does not sound HUGE

Just as a refresher/guesser:

Clawhammer should be around 105sqmm. In the same process, Palomino would be about 70-75sqmm and Morgan would be about 60-65sqmm. Sledge Hammer, which will probably not impact volumes much if at all in 2002, will probably be under 200sqmm. I think it will be less than double Claw's area, since if it's two cores, then there's a good chance that they're sharing some stuff, like the non-primary caches.

So Clawhammer will be a lot smaller than Northwood (estimated to be 140sqmm, though that's AMD's estimation), while Sledge will be somewhat larger. And, no, I will not compare it to Itanium, since they are not in the same market. Sledge is, at best, in the Xeon market, and Sledge will be bigger than the Xeon, perhaps by as much as 40%.

-JC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext