SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 307.20+2.0%Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (51329)8/31/2001 2:33:20 PM
From: Paul V.  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
Brian, Gottfried, Jacob, Katherine, threaders, Didn't CSCO store the excess inventory it purchased from JDSU on the property of JDSU. I believe i read that somewhere. This provided CSCO the opportunity to write off the JDSU inventory and buy it back at a lower cost. Include this fact and the fact that CSCO has reduced it inventory by 25%, IMO, this should be good for JDSU if a portion of the CSCO's inventory they have stored on site.

My question is when can we expect JDSU to eliminate its excess inventory and begin to increase production?

Does anyone know how JDSU play in the production cycle with CSCO, AMAT, LU, NT, etc.?

I have bought some JDSU and am trying to decide when I cane expect production to turn up.

Just my opinion.

Paul
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext