Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 249.66

+7.6%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (53437)	8/31/2001 6:54:11 PM
From: porn_start878	Read Replies (1) of 275872

That's a very bad example Maybe not that much. When I look in the past, the only thing intel improved with it's new stepping is what could be called the "binsplit curve". Their yield went from 0.5% at 1GHz to 40-50% they are now (maybe more). But the max speed only went from 1066MHz to 1.15GHz. And I repeat it : do not forget Intel went from Al to copper which has over 20% less current resistance. Add to that the fact that the improvements in the new steppings aren't only process related; a huge part of them are design related, and those are probably already included in tualatins. I feel that my example was actually far from as bad as yours (P4 demo). All that said, I find the AXIA stepping mystically different from the preceding ones (going from 1266MHz to 1450-1500MHz). I'm tempted to think that AMD may have optimized their design rules (be it interconnects or transistors). But another fact leads me to think the opposite : virtually ALL the Dresden production have been switched to AXIA at the same time, witch correspond much more to a real (design) stepping than a process (tools) change. wanna_NSX ;-P

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next