SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Emerging Company Report TV Program

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dbmedia who wrote (415)8/31/2001 7:35:17 PM
From: StockDung   of 526
 
TOP ELEVEN INDICATORS THAT THE MARKET FOR A COMPANY’S STOCK MIGHT BE MANIPULATED

In this era of online investing and enormously widespread interest in the stock market, grifters and con artists have abandoned snake oil and other small-time scams for a new game with higher stakes. Whether you call it a "pump and dump", or just a regular old-fashioned stock scam, some unscrupulous people have adopted the small-cap and over-the-counter stock markets as the site of some of the most profitable frauds in history.
Although there are plenty of perfectly honest companies traded on the over-the-counter and small-cap exchanges, private litigation uncovers hundreds of frauds every year. Here is a list of "red flags" that should tip you off that the market for a company’s stock might be manipulated and that you should proceed with caution.
No statements contained in this article should be interpreted as specifically applying to any given company. All examples cited to herein are entirely arbitrary and do not represent any actual facts or circumstances peculiar to any given company. This article does not constitute investment advice, and should not be regarded as such.

1. Beware of High Pressure Cold Callers

Frequently, scam companies will bribe or otherwise cajole seedy retail brokerages – otherwise known as "boiler-rooms", "bucket-shops"or "chop-shops" – into promoting their stock by cold-calling potential investors and touting the scam company’s stock as a great investment in a small company that is about to make it big. Some of these "bucket-shops" have been sanctioned and even closed down by state or federal securities regulators. Nevertheless, these operations are like the mythological hydra: when regulators close down one, it seems like two more appear in its place.

2. Beware of Stock Touts Who Are Paid by the Companies They Profile

Honest executives with honest companies should not obsess over the short term price of the company’s short term stock performance. Where a company has paid a "tout-sheet" (whether it be online or in the form of a radio show) to promote the company’s stock, your question should be, "Why? Why does this company care so much about its short term stock performance?" The answer all too frequently may be that the insiders want to pump up, or artificially inflate, the stock price so they can sell out at a profit – at your expense.

3. Beware of Small-Cap Companies with "High-Tech" Developmental Products that No One Understands

A common ploy used by stock scammers is to hype a company based on a purported high-tech product which will revolutionize a particular industry. Thus, whether the purported product is a miracle cure for the common cold or a telecommunications gizmo which will supposedly revolutionize the Internet, if the Company is thinly capitalized and there hasn’t been independent confirmation of the facts, you should be skeptical.

4. Beware of Cute Ticker Symbols

The heading says it all: if a Company has chosen a ridiculously catchy ticker symbol, perhaps they are more interested in selling stock than in doing legitimate business.

5. Beware of Oil Wells and Gold Mines in Inaccessible Parts of the World

Again, the heading says it all: if the company claims to have found a tremendous deposit of valuable minerals (be it gold, oil, or anything else) in some corner of the world that most people couldn’t find on a map, be wary and proceed with caution. Boldly optimistic claims may be very difficult to substantiate – or debunk – when the underlying events take place in an inaccessible part of the world.

6. Beware of Unsubstantiated Hype on Online Message Boards

Thinly traded stocks do not need a huge increase in buying activity to spur significant increases in the company’s stock price. For this reason, some scamsters have resorted to posting messages on these boards containing false rumors of huge new contracts, dramatic developments in products, or strategic alliances with big-name companies. The best assumption a potential investor can make is, if it’s not corroborated by an independent source, take everything you read on online message boards with a grain of salt.

7. Beware of Shady Corporate Management

Before buying a significant amount of stock in a small-cap company, you should investigate the company’s management. If any significant insiders have been sanctioned, convicted, or even merely investigated for any kind of financial crimes, or fraud of any sort, you may want to reconsider your potential purchase.

8. Beware of Momentum Plays Where the Fundamentals Don’t Justify the Run-Up

Investors sometimes get caught up in the flurry of activity which represents the "pump" (or dramatic up-swing in a company’s share prices) in the "pump and dump". Don’t be fooled by a quickly climbing share price: just because the price is going up does not mean it will continue to do so. Look at the fundamentals and ask yourself, "do the numbers justify this price?" If not, the chances are good that false hype is making up the difference, and the run-up won’t last.

9. Beware of Companies That Get Involved in Sexy New Areas of Business, Despite the Fact that the Company Has No Expertise

A company looking to run up its share prices may suddenly announce that it has acquired a new subsidiary, or entered into a new area of business which is totally unrelated to the company’s core operations – if it has any relationship at all. For example, if you are considering investing in a food processing company which has suddenly acquired a half interest in a developmental "Y2K" software joint venture, you should ask yourself if this company is serious about this new venture, or if the company is just in it for the hype?

10. Be Aware of Insider Sales

Honest officers and directors in well-managed companies frequently sell stock in their companies for completely legitimate and honest reasons. However, if the officers and directors in a company appear to be engaging in a program of stock sales which does not comport with previous behavior – that is, if the officers and directors appear to be selling in unusual quantities or at unusual times – then you should wonder what, if anything, these insiders know that you don’t.

11.BE AWARE OF Donald Baillargeon AKA dbmedia is hyping under is new alias today. For those that do not know Donald go to this link
sec.gov

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
Litigation Release No. 16223 / July 28, 1999

SEC v. ALLIANCE INDUSTRIES, PETER H. NORMAN, AND DONALD A. BAILLARGEON, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CIV-F-99-6073(RECDLB)(July 27, 1999)

SEC SUES TWO OFFICERS OF ALLIANCE INDUSTRIES
IN MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR MICROCAP FRAUD

Norman and Baillargeon Touted Alliance On the Internet,
Making False, Fanciful Projections and Claims About Its
Fast-Growing Paulownia Trees, Nationwide Chain of
Chiropractic Clinics, and Goat-Raising Business

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it filed a civil injunctive action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California alleging that two top officers of Alliance Industries, Peter H. Norman and Donald A. Baillargeon, carried out a wide-ranging manipulation of Alliance's stock from January to November 1996, causing investors to lose millions of dollars. Norman is the chairman and CEO of Alliance, a small holding company based in Bakersfield, California. Baillargeon served as Alliance's vice president for marketing and public relations.

The Commission's complaint alleges that Norman and Baillargeon used Alliance's internet web site to make materially false representations about businesses in which various Alliance subsidiaries were supposedly engaged, including the cultivation and sale of fast-growing "paulownia" hardwood trees, the breeding and selling of live goats and goat carcasses, and the development of a nationwide chain of chiropractic clinics. The complaint alleges that, contrary to the representations, Alliance owned no paulownia tree technology or plantations, did not own or operate a goat business, and was not developing a chain of chiropractic clinics. Nonetheless, according to the complaint, Norman and Baillargeon projected that Alliance's various businesses would generate $4.8 billion over a projected ten-year period, and that the paulownia tree business alone would bring Alliance more than $l billion in annual revenue by 2006. The complaint alleges that those and other projections had no reasonable basis and were materially false and misleading.

According to the complaint, Norman controlled about 80% of the 24 million shares of Alliance common stock outstanding. The complaint states that the stock, which was listed for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, rose from $1.00 per share in January 1996 to a split-adjusted high of $46 on November 21, 1996, when the Commission issued a ten-day trading suspension.

The complaint also alleges that Norman engaged in a series of manipulative securities transactions, including "wash trading," designed to make it appear that there was an active market for Alliance stock. According to the complaint, Norman's own purchases and sales accounted for 100% of the trading in Alliance on numerous trading days. The complaint further alleges that Norman sold more than 2.2 million shares of Alliance common stock to the public between May 1996 and March 1997, making millions of dollars in illegal profits.

The Commission seeks an order enjoining Norman, Baillargeon, and Alliance from further violations of Section Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5, and enjoining Norman and Alliance from further violations of Section 5 of the Securities Act. The complaint also seeks an order directing Norman to pay disgorgement, imposing civil monetary penalties upon Norman and Baillargeon, barring Norman from serving as an officer or director of any public company, and other unspecified relief.

This enforcement action is part of the Commission's four-pronged approach to attacking microcap fraud: enforcement, inspections, investor education and regulation. For more information about the SEC's response to microcap fraud and the litigation releases for these cases, visit the SEC's Microcap Fraud Information Center at http:// www.sec.gov/news/extra/microcap.htm.

Investors are advised to read the SEC's "Cyberspace" Alert before purchasing any investment promoted on the internet. The free publication, which alerts investors to the telltale signs of online investment fraud, is available on the Investor Assistance and Complaints link of the SEC's home page on the World Wide Web . It can also be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330. Investors are encouraged to report suspicious Internet offerings (or other suspicious offerings) via e-mail to . A user-friendly form to assist you in making a report is available at the Enforcement Complaint Center, Mail Stop 8-4, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext