SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.580+1.5%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (14766)9/1/2001 5:58:34 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) of 34857
 
I understand damned little of what you write, Illmarinen. I doubt that too many do.

My understanding is that Naantali resulted in a rejection of Nokia's proposal to use DCCM as an alternative while PCCCH and PBCCH were "tested and verified".

I do not know whether CCCH and BCCH sets can be legally sold in Europe but I assume anything is possible so I'll take it for granted that they can. However, the problem I have is that operators either now have PBCCH/PCCCH functionality built into their networks or will have it shortly. Why would any responsible operator, therefore, promote handsets that need to be recalled? And why would any self-respecting manufacturer enter into a scheme whereby it goes through the embarrassment of having its sets recalled?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News