SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Coming Financial Collapse Moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (598)9/2/2001 1:44:40 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!  Read Replies (1) of 974
 
biz.yahoo.com

Saturday September 1, 5:02 pm Eastern Time

U.S. recovery hinges on productivity, study says

(UPDATE: recasts lead, adds new quotes)

By Glenn Somerville

JACKSON HOLE, Wyoming, Sept 1 (Reuters)
- The cloud of uncertainty that overhangs the economy currently stems largely from questions about whether the productivity surge that fueled growth in the 1990s can stay on track, a meeting of top policymakers, bankers and academics agreed on Saturday.

As participants at the annual Jackson Hole conference sparred gently over the proper policy to follow to foster greater productivity, or output per worker, all agreed a recovery from the current slowdown hinges on that happening.

``Provided the productivity trend continues to be strong the economy should recover normally in a few quarters,'' Martin Baily of the Washington-based Institute of International Economics argued before a symposium on the New Economy that included Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan among participants.

``If the productivity trend collapses, however, the favorable performance of the 90s could unravel, with higher inflation, higher unemployment, slower growth, stock market weakness and a dollar that could drop sharply,'' he warned.

Baily coupled his caution with a criticism of the Bush administration's tax-cutting policies, which he suggested ran counter to the country's need to encourage national savings.

DISCIPLINE SPENDING TOO

That position was countered by Treasury Under Secretary John Taylor, who said the term ``fiscal discipline'' applied equally to constraining spending -- something the Bush administration has been urging on Congress amid evidence the prolonged slowdown is chipping away future budget surpluses.

``There's no reason to have an aversion only to tax cuts,'' Taylor said. ``That can be applied to spending as well.''

The economy has been slowing since mid-2000, growing at its slowest pace in eight years during the second quarter this year when gross domestic product crawled ahead at a 0.2 percent annual rate.

Still, consumers maintained a relatively healthy spending pace and inventories were drawn down sharply, potentially leaving room for a pickup in output -- and for productivity gains -- later this year and into 2002, analysts said.

Productivity measures output per worker and a rising level is associated with an improvement in living standards because it usually is accompanied by higher pay rates.

The issue of productivity was much on symposium members' minds as they met to ponder the direction of the so-called New Economy. The New Economy, spurred by the technology revolution, has added huge amounts of information-processing capability to the economy over the past decade.

Baily, who served as chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisors in the former Clinton administration, included some implicit criticisms of the Bush administration's policies in his remarks.

TAX CUTS ILL-TIMED

He said the large cut in personal income taxes the Bush administration pushed through this summer was ``particularly bad policy'' when the United States already was running a big deficit in its current account, which measures trade in goods and services with the rest of the world.

``We need to increase national saving, not decrease it over the next 10 years,'' Baily said, He noted there was considerable doubt about the future of budget surpluses amid the economic slowdown. In addition, the United States must prepare for a wave of ``baby boomers'' born after World War Two who will be retiring around 2010.

Baily said he worried that, ``If productivity weakens, this will raise the possibility of stagflation, just as we saw in the 1970s when productivity slowed.'' The term refers to a lengthy period of slow or stagnant growth, accompanied by rising prices that are not offset by increased output.

While insisting that he was an optimist about the economy, Baily said the favorable conditions of the 1990s were unlikely to reappear in the foreseeable future.

``Even if the trend of strong productivity growth continues, it seems virtually certain that the dollar will weaken substantially, the stock market will perform less well and the unemployment-inflation trade-off will worsen,'' he said.

During the 1990s, Baily noted, Fed policymakers had the advantage of a steadily growing economy as a backdrop for adjusting interest rates. If productivity wanes in coming years, it may be more difficult to make the necessary changes.

``To bolster demand, sustained low interest rates would be called for, but the difficulty would be that, with slow productivity growth, the current pace of wage and compensation increases would not be consistent with the low pace of core inflation achieved in recent years,'' Baily wrote.

KJC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext