SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 41.41+2.2%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: NITT who wrote (142722)9/4/2001 6:46:22 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
BTW, if Intel is in fact able to keep the clockrate/performance distance between themselves and AMD (which I believe they can), then they could weather this slowdown very easily.

You might want to walk through the numbers in anandtech.com and anandtech.com , to observe exactly how much of a performance "distance" Intel has achieved with a chip that's 150% bigger. In plenty of cases, the "distance" is negative. Intel certainly leads in the ability to shove inefficient parts down people's throats and promote silly frequency numbers as a "performance" measure, and that's got to be worth something. Anybody who'd pay 5 times as much for an Intel chip that performs no better than the top of the line Athlon deserves to be divested of their hard earned cash.

For further amusement, you can observe Intel having it both ways on P4 operating frequency versus Itanic operating frequency.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News